Why Your Techs Lose 2 Hours Daily to Bad Routing

$62,000 Per Tech Lost to Bad Routes

Your techs spend 25-35% of their day driving. Not working. Driving.

At $75/hour fully loaded cost, that is $60-$70 per day per tech in windshield time. Ten techs = $600-$700 daily. Annual cost: $156,000-$182,000.

That is the baseline. Every shop has windshield time. The question is whether you are at 25% (efficient) or 35%+ (hemorrhaging money).

The Dispatcher Juggle Nobody Sees

Your dispatcher stares at a map every morning. Ten techs. Six jobs each. Sixty pins scattered across town.

They drag appointments around. "This looks fine." Routes seem logical on a screen.

By 2 PM, techs are crisscrossing. One finishes north, drives 40 minutes south. Another tech drives past that northern neighborhood heading the opposite direction.

This happens daily. Not because dispatchers are bad at their job. Because their tools show a map, not optimization.

GPS Tracking Is Not Route Optimization

GPS shows where your techs are. That is visibility, not optimization.

Knowing a tech is 30 minutes away after you already booked the job does not help. The damage is done.

Real-time tracking is useful for customer ETAs. It does nothing to prevent bad routes from forming in the first place.

The Math on Inefficient Routing

Industry data shows 20-30% windshield time in urban markets is good performance. Above 35% is a red flag.

Most shops operate at 30-35% without route optimization. With optimization, that drops to 20-25%.

The difference at scale:

• One extra hour daily driving per tech
• Five hours weekly wasted
• 250 hours annually (50 work weeks)
• At $75/hour fully loaded cost: $18,750 per tech per year

Add fuel costs. Extra 100 miles weekly at $0.60/mile = $3,120 annually.

Total direct cost: $21,870 per tech per year from one extra hour daily driving.

Ten techs = $218,700 annually.

That does not count opportunity cost. Jobs you could have completed but did not.

What 25-30% Drive Time Reduction Means

Route optimization software cuts drive time 25-30% according to Badger Maps, Salesforce, and field service industry studies.

For a shop averaging 30% windshield time (2.4 hours per 8-hour day), a 30% reduction saves 43 minutes daily per tech.

At ten techs, that is 7.2 hours recovered daily. At $75/hour, that is $540 in reclaimed billable time per day.

Annual impact: $140,400 in recovered capacity.

Add 2-3 more jobs per tech daily. At $300 average ticket, that is $600-$900 more revenue per tech per day.

For ten techs: $6,000-$9,000 daily. Annual: $1.56M-$2.34M.

The Fix Nobody Sells You Right

Most route optimization happens after booking. Software takes your scattered appointments and reorders them.

That helps. But it misses the key opportunity.

Real optimization happens before booking. During booking.

When a customer picks a time slot, the system scores how well that slot clusters with existing jobs. "Recommended" times appear highlighted. Customers pick those naturally. Why would they not?

Routes optimize themselves through the booking process. Not after the fact.

Why This Is Invisible

Traditional scheduling software shows all time slots equally. 10 AM Tuesday looks the same as 2 PM Thursday.

But one creates an efficient cluster. The other forces a tech to drive across town.

Dispatchers cannot see this difference. They book based on availability, not efficiency.

Clustering scores make efficiency visible. Green slots cluster well. Red slots are isolated. Decision-making changes instantly.

Contrarian Take: Saying No Is Profitable

"We serve the whole metro area" sounds impressive. It costs a fortune.

The best HVAC shops dominate neighborhoods, not cities. Clustered service areas mean shorter drives, more jobs, better word-of-mouth.

Turning down a job 45 minutes outside your zone feels wrong. It is profitable.

Run the math. That job costs an extra 90 minutes windshield time (round trip). At $75/hour, that is $112.50 in drive cost.

Average residential service call generates $300-$500 gross. Subtract parts, labor, overhead, and that extra drive time. Net margin disappears.

Say yes to jobs in your zones. Say no to scattered work. Margin improves immediately.

What Works at Small Scale

You do not need software to start. Manual improvements work:

Divide your service area into 4-6 zones. North, south, east, west, downtown, suburbs.

Assign zone days. Monday is north side. Tuesday is east. Wednesday is south.

When booking, ask "which zone fits best?" before "which tech is free?"

Track windshield time weekly. Measure before and after.

This alone cuts drive time 15-20% for most shops. Free. Implemented in a week.

What Works at Growth Scale

Around 8-10 techs, manual zone management breaks down. Too many jobs. Too many variables. Dispatchers spend 2+ hours daily on routing.

That is when you need algorithmic clustering. Software scores every time slot based on:

• Geographic proximity to existing jobs
• Technician skills and availability
• Job duration and priority
• Customer time windows

Customers see "recommended" times during booking. Dispatchers see efficiency scores when scheduling manually. This is what intelligent scheduling delivers.

Routes build themselves. 30-40% less drive time. 2-3 more jobs per tech daily.

Why Most HVAC Software Skips This

Route optimization is hard to build. Most field service software companies avoid it.

They give you a map. Drag and drop. "Optimization" button that reorders stops.

That is not optimization. That is rearrangement.

Building real clustering requires spatial algorithms, machine learning, and domain expertise. Most vendors do not have that.

So they market basic features as "smart scheduling" and hope you do not notice the difference.

Questions to Ask Your Current Software

Can dispatchers see which time slots cluster efficiently before booking?

Or do they schedule based on availability and optimize later?

Does your booking system score time slots and recommend efficient options to customers?

Or does every slot look identical?

When you click "optimize route," does it rearrange today's jobs? Or does it prevent bad routes from forming in the first place?

If the answers are all "optimize later," you are leaving money on the table daily.

The Annual Cost Breakdown

Conservative scenario for one tech with poor routing:

• Lost billable time: 5 hours weekly at $75/hour = $19,500 annually
• Fuel costs: 100 extra miles weekly at $0.60/mile = $3,120 annually
• Opportunity cost (jobs not completed): $25,000-$40,000 lost revenue annually
• Total per tech: $47,620-$62,620 annually

Ten techs = $476,200-$626,200 annually.

That is not software cost. That is cash leaving your business every year because routes are inefficient.

Implementation Reality

Software vendors promise 3-month implementations. That is a red flag.

Modern route optimization should go live in days. Import your existing schedule. Algorithm scores it immediately. Start seeing recommendations.

If implementation takes months, the architecture is legacy. You are paying for their technical debt.

What to Look For

Route optimization integrated into booking. Not a separate tool you run at end of day.

Clustering scores visible to dispatchers. Color-coded calendar showing efficient vs isolated slots.

Customer-facing recommendations. Online booking highlights times that cluster well.

Real-time recalculation. When emergency calls come in, system rescores and suggests adjustments.

Clean sheet design. Built from scratch for physical work businesses. Not legacy software patched together over decades.

The Bottom Line

Windshield time is theft. Not from your techs. From your business.

Every hour driving is an hour not billing. At scale, bad routing costs $200,000-$600,000+ annually for a 10-tech shop.

Route optimization is not a nice-to-have feature. It is a profit center.

Start by measuring your current windshield time percentage. Industry baseline is 20-30% in urban markets. Above 35% means you are bleeding money.

Implement manual zone management first. Immediate improvement. No software required.

When manual breaks down, algorithmic clustering is the answer. 30-40% drive time reduction. 2-3 more jobs per tech daily. $800K-$1M+ annual impact for growing shops.

The math is not debatable. Efficient routing prints money. Inefficient routing burns it.

---

Related Resources

• Scheduling & Dispatch Features - See Plenum's clustering in action
• HVAC Route Optimization Guide - Deep dive on clustering algorithms
• Smart Scheduling for Extra Jobs - More on scheduling efficiency
• ROI Calculator - Calculate your potential savings